New DEA data shows an increase in air pollution in parts of Sydney

An independent study of coal power’s health impacts by epidemiologist and researcher Dr Benjamin Ewald published last year stated 279 deaths occur in New South Wales alone annually from related air pollution. In an article from SolarQuotes, this year's NPI report strengthens the case for getting tough on air pollution.

“State premiers could, at the stroke of a pen, reduce this toxic air pollution by 95% or more by requiring coal-burning generators to install best available technology to control fine particle pollution, mercury, sulfur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide,” said EJA researcher, Dr James Whelan.

Just on the issue of mercury, the National Pollutant Inventory indicates Victorian coal-fired power stations were emitting far more it than other plants in Australia. Alinta’s Loy Yang B – 280kg per annum AGL’s Loy Yang A – 292kg per annum EnergyAustralia’s Yallourn – 436kg per annum Most other coal generators across the nation reported mercury emissions well under 100kg per annum. But that doesn’t make them “clean”. Other disturbing stats pulled from the report include Tarong power station in Queensland emitted more than 2 million kilograms of fine particle pollution, which EJA says is 15 times more than Origin Energy’s Eraring facility, Australia’s largest operating coal power station. So, what does Eraring have that Tarong doesn’t? Bag filters.

Estimated Vs. Actual Emissions EJA also point out most power station operators estimate their various emissions using handbooks developed decades ago. The difference between estimated and actual measurements could be huge. It cites the example of QLD government-owned Stanwell Power Station, which installed continuous emission monitoring. The result? Its reported emissions of oxides of nitrogen doubled – from 18 to 36 million kilograms. Dr. Whelan says all power stations should be compelled to install continuous stack monitoring and technologies including bag filters, flue gas desulfurisation and selective catalytic reduction. As for Dr. Ewald, who is also a member of Doctors for the Environment, he believes Australian governments should reject all proposals for new or expanded power stations unless they include modern pollution control technologies.

The full article can be read here.


JOIN DEA NOW and make a difference! DONATE FACT SHEETS
ACNC Registered Charity

FOLLOW US


DEA IN A HEARTBEAT

Who, What and Why

iDEA18

Watch presentations from our recent conference

Dr Bob Brown Keynote Address

WHAT CAN I DO FOR THE ENVIRONMENT?

(part 1)

(part 2)

DEA INFORMATION LEAFLET

DEA Information Leaflet

DEA INFORMATION BROCHURE

DEA Information Brochure

DEA receives funding from the Lord Mayor's Charitable Foundation

Lord Mayor's Charitable Foundation

LIKE US ON FACEBOOK!

FOLLOW US ON TWITTER!


3