Advertiser: Nuclear waste dump just another bad option — what about renewable energy?

Advertiser: Nuclear waste dump just another bad option — what about renewable energy?

South Australia’s recent Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission has recommended avoiding some bad options: no nuclear power generation and no reprocessing or fuel leasing in the foreseeable future.

However, according to this oped by Professor John Willoughby, a bad option it found acceptable is allowing a proportion of the world’s most dangerous high-level nuclear waste to be transported to SA for long-term disposal.

The impact on life and health from a major release of radioactivity from nuclear accidents is severe and immediate, and  the nuclear fuel chain discussion detracts from the challenges of finding a sustainable way to live without adding carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gases to our atmosphere.

In contrast, renewable sources of energy (solar, wind) have no ongoing risks for the community and offer the best sollution towards a stable future.

This oped first appeared in the Advertiser on 18 February 2016. You can read the full article HERE.

FACT SHEETS JOIN DEA NOW and make a difference! DONATE
ACNC Registered Charity

FOLLOW US


DEA IN A HEARTBEAT

Who, What and Why

iDEA18

Watch presentations from our recent conference

Dr Bob Brown Keynote Address

WHAT CAN I DO FOR THE ENVIRONMENT?

(part 1)

(part 2)

DEA INFORMATION LEAFLET

DEA Information Leaflet

DEA INFORMATION BROCHURE

DEA Information Brochure

DEA receives funding from the Lord Mayor's Charitable Foundation

Lord Mayor's Charitable Foundation

LIKE US ON FACEBOOK!

FOLLOW US ON TWITTER!


3