Advertiser: Nuclear waste dump just another bad option — what about renewable energy?

Advertiser: Nuclear waste dump just another bad option — what about renewable energy?

South Australia’s recent Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission has recommended avoiding some bad options: no nuclear power generation and no reprocessing or fuel leasing in the foreseeable future.

However, according to this oped by Professor John Willoughby, a bad option it found acceptable is allowing a proportion of the world’s most dangerous high-level nuclear waste to be transported to SA for long-term disposal.

The impact on life and health from a major release of radioactivity from nuclear accidents is severe and immediate, and  the nuclear fuel chain discussion detracts from the challenges of finding a sustainable way to live without adding carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gases to our atmosphere.

In contrast, renewable sources of energy (solar, wind) have no ongoing risks for the community and offer the best sollution towards a stable future.

This oped first appeared in the Advertiser on 18 February 2016. You can read the full article HERE.

JOIN DEA NOW and make a difference! DONATE LEAVE A LEGACY make a bequest for future generations FACT SHEETS
ACNC Registered Charity

FOLLOW US


DEA IN A HEARTBEAT

Who, What and Why

WHAT CAN I DO FOR THE ENVIRONMENT?

(part 1)

(part 2)

DEA INFORMATION LEAFLET

DEA Information Leaflet

DEA INFORMATION BROCHURE

DEA Information Brochure

LIKE US ON FACEBOOK!

FOLLOW US ON TWITTER!